Discussion:
[Tools-discuss] Odd bug with nonexistent RFC
Martin Thomson
2018-07-15 18:02:29 UTC
Permalink
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc397

The IETF site says 397, but this says 387. RFC 387 does appear to exist.

___________________________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-***@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
or send email to datatracker-***@ietf.org

Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
or send email to ***@tools.ietf.org
Henrik Levkowetz
2018-07-15 18:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Martin Thomson
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc397
The IETF site says 397, but this says 387. RFC 387 does appear to exist.
Huh. I've deleted the tools copy, which will cause it to be re-fetched
from the RFC Editor's copy. The RFC Editor's copy seems to have been
corrected in 2016.

Henrik
Post by Martin Thomson
___________________________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
___________________________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
Tools-***@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
or send email to datatracker-***@ietf.org

Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
or send email to ***@tools.ietf.org

Loading...